From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11390f,4c42ac518eba0bbe X-Google-Attributes: gid11390f,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,4c42ac518eba0bbe X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,4c42ac518eba0bbe X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c42ac518eba0bbe X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Matt Subject: Re: Programming language vote - results Date: 1997/11/19 Message-ID: <3473B4D4.339A@itsnet.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 290894180 References: <343fbb5a.0@news.iprolink.ch> <34466EB4.3381@dynamite.com.au> <6275dt$agm$3@news.on> <344BCED0.2D51@dynamite.com.au> <62tpap$7gh$1@darla.visi.com> <3470EF6E.F74@lysator.liu.se> <64qsf0$ccc@dfw-ixnews11.ix.netcom.com> <01bcf4f4$8fdc2c60$0200000a@kld_mcs> To: Mike Smith Reply-To: mcorey@itsnet.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.apl,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++ Date: 1997-11-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > Yeah, and what's wrong with that? Looks good to me - better than the > logical expression. And in the first case, > > if (!call_this) call_that(); ^ Uh, Mike. | A good programmer remembers to Call the function! ;-) ---- sorry, I couldn't resist!!! Matt