From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,59d24b21703c2885
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Richard Toy <rtoy@dera.gov.uk>
Subject: Re: Use of constants on EFA
Date: 1997/11/17
Message-ID: <34703DEA.37AB@dera.gov.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 290147847
References: <63qkmc$8va$1@uttwil.bodensee.com>
 <01bceece$4a6a85e0$423c63c3@default> <64ahc0$dk1@top.mitre.org>
 <34690D2D.6721@hello.confusion.nl> <64bip0$6g6$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
 <01bcefb3$a8ac9b80$a93163c3@default>
To: Laura Palmer <thepalmers@lineone.net>
Organization: Eurocontrol EFMS Integration Team
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-11-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Just out of interest...

What is your response to the arguments put forward by Dewar et al?

Do you agree with the programer or customers interpretation of the
requirement?

-- 
Regards

Richard Toy

rtoy@dera.gov.uk