From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fdb77,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 10261c,90121986704b5776 X-Google-Attributes: gid10261c,public X-Google-Thread: 10c950,90121986704b5776 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c950,public From: "Stanley R. Allen" Subject: Re: which languages suck Date: 1997/11/12 Message-ID: <346A5026.794B@hso.link.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 289063685 References: <34557f2b.1934172@news.mindspring.com> <34566fe9.447229@news.mindspring.com> <345673af.1413708@news.mindspring.com> <3456b9f3.0@news.eznet.net> <3456e71b.3833189@news.mindspring.com> <3459AC95.1D75@dynamite.com.au> <3468B532.3ACC@le.ac.uk> <64dedg$i9o@netra.montana.edu> Organization: NASA, Kennedy Space Center Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.lang.pascal.ansi-iso,comp.lang.pascal.misc Date: 1997-11-12T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Larry Elmore wrote: > > GNAT is a validated Ada 95 compiler. I'm not at all sure, but I think it > still might be the _only_ validated Ada 95 compiler available. Maybe that's > changed recently, though. There are over 80 validated Ada95 compilers (at last count), and numerous others which correctly operate but do not have a validation certificate. But I believe that GNAT is the only validated one for Linux. -- Stanley Allen mailto:s_allen@hso.link.com