From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,34d47d048b177d0b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: Re: limited/non-limited in Ada95
Date: 1997/10/18
Message-ID: <3449390f.142507@SantaClara01.news.InterNex.Net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 281624918
References: <3442C2A3.3781@bix.com>
 <mheaney-ya023680001610972221540001@news.ni.net>
 <ufhgaghueo.fsf@synquiry.com>
Organization: InterNex Information Services 1-800-595-3333
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-10-18T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


>important capabilities of limited types
The one that bit me most recently was that you can't have access
values as discriminants of non-limited types.