From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd7c9,4c42ac518eba0bbe X-Google-Attributes: gidfd7c9,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,4c42ac518eba0bbe X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 1094ba,4c42ac518eba0bbe X-Google-Attributes: gid1094ba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4c42ac518eba0bbe X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 11390f,4c42ac518eba0bbe X-Google-Attributes: gid11390f,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,4c42ac518eba0bbe X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: "Gary L. Scott" Subject: Re: Programming language vote - results Date: 1997/10/11 Message-ID: <343FD05C.8986A557@flash.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 279608756 References: <343fbb5a.0@news.iprolink.ch> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Organization: Home Reply-To: scottg@flash.net Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.apl,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.forth,comp.lang.fortran Date: 1997-10-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Oh the horror stories about Ada just about anyone in the defense industry could tell you...(inefficiency, bloat, development delays, budget overruns)...I dare you to fit a Jovial application that already max's out a computer's capabilities in the same box using OO techniques in Ada...In fact, multiply memory and CPU throughput by 10 and try it. You will likely be forced to back off OO quite a bit, making an even bigger mess of maintainability/reusability... Vincent Lambercy wrote: > After two weeks, Ada and Smalltalk seems to be the best languages. If > you > don't thik so (or if you think so), vote on > homepages.iprolink.ch/~lambercy -- Gary L. Scott scottg@flash.net