From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4e9bbed6d526bc3f
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Dave Wood <dpw@sd.aonix.com>
Subject: Re: Ada95 & CORBA
Date: 1997/10/04
Message-ID: <343728A1.A7EA7660@sd.aonix.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 277944445
Cache-Post-Path: wagasa.cts.com!unknown@199.164.191.83
References: <01bcd070$a4fa1a60$2613c6cf@hooligan1>
Organization: Aonix
Reply-To: dpw@sd.aonix.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-10-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


You might check into the following products:

ORBAda by TopGraphX
ORBExpress by OIS

Both products claim to be fully CORBA-2 compliant ORBs
with extremely similar feature profiles, and both with
the great benefit of being written in Ada 95.

Both are new products and so may not yet work with 
all available compilers.

-- Dave Wood
-- Product Manager, ObjectAda for Windows
-- Aonix


Ed Hourigan wrote:
> 
> Can anyone point me to info on Ada95 and CORBA.  More specifically, what
> CORBA vendors support
> Ada95?
> 
> Recently I was "forced" to switch from Ada to C++ because our  customer
> wanted CORBA.
> Its a nightmare.  You cannot do large scale software with C++.  It just
> doesn't support it as
> well as Ada does.
> 
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------
> ----------------------------------------------------