From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df93c03e1f3557b8,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Richard L. Johnson" <JOHNSON@halley.aero.org>
Subject: How good is GNAT?
Date: 1997/10/01
Message-ID: <343204CB.6E32CE6A@halley.aero.org>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 277058226
Organization: user$disk:[johnson]organization
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-10-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


I am working with a group who is considering the use of the GNAT
compiler on a Sun running Solaris.  I am looking for opinions about the
compiler's reliability, performance, quality of ACT's support, problems,
etc.  Any inputs are welcome.  I will summarize the results and repost
them soon for anyone else who wants to know the same info.  Thanks in
advance.
-- 

-------------------------
Rick Johnson
The Aerospace Corporation
email: johnson@aero.org
Phone: (310)336-3588