From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ec4cde5d799065b6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <nospam@gsg.eds.com>
Subject: Re: Coding Standards & GOTO
Date: 1997/09/24
Message-ID: <34297B78.6151@gsg.eds.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 275291027
References: <dewar.874848062@merv> <3426B51E.7296@lmco.com>
 <mheaney-ya023680002209971952370001@news.ni.net>
 <6092vo$aai@wdl1.wdl.lmco.com>
Organization: EDS MS
Reply-To: nospam@gsg.eds.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-09-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Mark A Biggar wrote:
> 
> Also, the best way to enforce any code formatting style guidelines is to
> provide a standard pretty-printer that must be run before the inspection.

Those tend to mess up the layout of comments. A better way is to use a 
syntax-oriented editor that lays the code out with proper indentation as
it
is keyed in.

> --
> Mark Biggar
> mab@wdl.lmco.com

-- 

                        Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
                        Senior Software SE

The values in from and reply-to are for the benefit of spammers:
reply to domain eds.com, user msustys1.smetz or to domain gsg.eds.com,
user smetz. Do not reply to spamtrap@library.lspace.org