From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,39a8b74d496a2bbc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "John G. Volan" Subject: Re: Can ADA95 inherit from C++ classes Date: 1997/09/22 Message-ID: <3426FF88.5BA4@ac3i.dseg.ti.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 274657640 References: <5vltvf$q1m$1@news.cc.ucf.edu> <34212D90.318E@gsfc.nasa.gov> Reply-To: johnv@ac3i.dseg.ti.com Organization: Raytheon TI Systems Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-09-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote: > > People have experimented successfully with example bindings to C++ in > other environments (e.g. Microsoft C++)... If anyone has successfully ported GNAT's Interfaces.CPP to Microsoft Visual C++, I would very much like to know! Something that can provide a real binding to the Microsoft Foundation Classes without sacrificing the OO-ness of either C++ or Ada95 is extremely desirable! -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Internet.Usenet.Put_Signature (Name => "John G. Volan", Employer => "Raytheon/TI Advanced C3I Systems, San Jose, CA", Work_Email => "jvolan@ti.com", Home_Email => "johnvolan@sprintmail.com", Slogan => "Ada95: World's *FIRST* International-Standard OOPL", Disclaimer => "My employer never defined these opinions, so using " & "them would be totally erroneous...or is that just " & "nondeterministic behavior now? :-) "); ------------------------------------------------------------------------