From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: fac41,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d3f20d31be1c33a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Owen Fellows Subject: Re: Separation of IF and Imp: process issue? Date: 1997/09/16 Message-ID: <341ECA45.826609AA@calfp.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 273015962 References: <33E9ADE9.4709@flash.net> <5utag9$o6s@newshub.atmnet.net> <5v1gua$fkk@newshub.atmnet.net> <5v2k2n$1cfu$2@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu> <5v4095$h62@newshub.atmnet.net> X-NNTP-Posting-Host: calfp.demon.co.uk [158.152.70.168] Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel Date: 1997-09-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote: > So, let me repeat my question of before, who among you Eiffel programmers > HAS worked in a fully configuration managed environment (and I mean more > than simply using RCS to check in and check out files, though even here > the point about separate specs and bodies is relevant)? It would be > interesting to hear how you handle the issue of access rights for > modification of specifications (i.e. short forms) I've worked in both. In my current enviroment, if you change the spec, you have to make the changes so nothing is broken, and that includes updating the regression tests. In other words, your responsible. Nick (From Owen's account)