From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d3f20d31be1c33a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Samuel T. Harris" Subject: Re: Interface/Implementation (was Re: Design by Contract) Date: 1997/09/15 Message-ID: <341D712A.64729C4F@hso.link.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 272701489 References: <5var3e$s63$1@trumpet.uni-mannheim.de> <34195A46.3F08E09@hso.link.com> Organization: Hughes Training Inc. - Houston Operations Newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel Date: 1997-09-15T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Jon S Anthony wrote: > > In article <34195A46.3F08E09@hso.link.com> "Samuel T. Harris" writes: > > > For Joachim's benefit, this is done via a renaming declaration for > > packages, subprograms, and variables; and a subtype for types. > > There are no renames declarations for types. > > Yes there is (though it is achieved in a not "as clear" fashion: subtype) > > type T is ... > > ... > > subtype My_New_Name_For_T is T; > Excuse me! I believe I SAID subtypes for types. And subtype is NOT a renaming declaration. The semantics of the two are very different. -- Samuel T. Harris, Senior Engineer Hughes Training, Inc. - Houston Operations 2224 Bay Area Blvd. Houston, TX 77058-2099 "If you can make it, We can fake it!"