From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d3f20d31be1c33a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
From: Samuel Mize <smize@link.com>
Subject: Re: Interface/Implementation (was Re: Design by Contract)
Date: 1997/09/10
Message-ID: <341702C2.4AA@link.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 271420225
References: <mheaney-ya023680000709972001170001@news.ni.net>
 <EG9y0E.C65@syd.csa.com.au> <3416CA7D.50A@link.com>
Reply-To: smize@link.com
Organization: Hughes Training Inc.
Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel
Date: 1997-09-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Oops, sorry.

Samuel Mize wrote:
> I'm not saying such a design is necessarily BAD.  It may be a case
> where dependency ordering is NOT helpful, so you shouldn't try to use
> it.                          ^^^insert


Sam Mize