From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,2c6139ce13be9980 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d3f20d31be1c33a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" Subject: Re: Separation of IF and Imp: process issue? Date: 1997/09/08 Message-ID: <341431A5.8E2@pseserv3.fw.hac.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 270766524 Sender: usenet@most.fw.hac.com (News Administration) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: sparc02 References: <33E9ADE9.4709@flash.net> <5upe9k$7he@newshub.atmnet.net> <5utag9$o6s@newshub.atmnet.net> Organization: Hughes Defense Communications Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel Date: 1997-09-08T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > And if you argue that Eiffel should be as easy as Ada in Ada's strong > points, while ignoring Eiffel's strong points, you wind up with odd > misunderstandings. That's not what happened. Ada folks claimed that separation of spec and body was an advantage. Eiffel folks responded, "No, it's not, because we can simulate it this way." Ada folks said, "If you have to do something kludgey to simulate it, then it is an advantage of Ada." That may be "ignoring Eiffel's strong points," but it is not denying them... -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wes Groleau, Hughes Defense Communications, Fort Wayne, IN USA Senior Software Engineer - AFATDS Tool-smith Wanna-be wwgrol AT pseserv3.fw.hac.com Don't send advertisements to this domain unless asked! All disk space on fw.hac.com hosts belongs to either Hughes Defense Communications or the United States government. Using email to store YOUR advertising on them is trespassing! ----------------------------------------------------------------------