From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e35f2efd6c0447ec X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Michael & Amy Hartsough Subject: Re: Death of DSP support? Date: 1997/09/03 Message-ID: <340E2B35.52DC@worldnet.att.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 269818699 References: <3402E91D.6D1A@top.monad.net> <1997Aug27.125655.1@eisner> <5u86eg$n8d@bgtnsc02.worldnet.att.net> <340CB5A6.71E7@flash.net> Organization: AT&T WorldNet Services Reply-To: Hartsough@worldnet.att.net Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-09-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Ken Garlington wrote: > > Michael & Amy Hartsough wrote: > > > > However, I read recently > > that becoming the champion of an unpopular cause is a sure-fire > > way of ruining your career. So I'm not too sure that I want to > > stick my neck out for what appears to be a "lost cause". > > I've pretty much _built_ my career (such as it is) by championing > unpopular causes, so I can't agree with this assertion. It was in some career guidance book. > Be tactful Not exactly my forte. ;^) > But it's probably worth noting to him > that his competitors still seem to be interested in Ada. You might > ask him why... This sounds like an interesting approach. We have "lunchtime" technical seminars, and I was thinking about putting together a 30 minute presentation using parts of the Ada advocacy package. Unfortunately, there are some slides in there that could really use backup charts, and I don't see any references. For instance, in Charles Engle's presentation, he quotes some SEI studies, but doesn't provide any background on what criteria was used, or how certain "software attributes" were selected. Later, Michael