From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ffdd4d59cbfb4caf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Tom Moran Subject: Re: Ada 95 Numerics questions for the experts Date: 1997/08/31 Message-ID: <3409BAC9.2233@bix.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 269213813 References: Reply-To: tmoran@bix.com Organization: InterNex Information Services 1-800-595-3333 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-08-31T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > someone once arguing for a word size of 72 bits on the grounds that it had > a lot of factors 60 has just as many factors and was in fact the word size, as I recall, on the CDC 6600 series.