From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,d24e07f660698f1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,d24e07f660698f1 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d24e07f660698f1 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d24e07f660698f1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: walth@netcom.com (Walt Howard) Subject: Re: Eiffel anyone? - Who uses it? Date: 1997/08/02 Message-ID: <33ea7c4e.4022238@news.deltanet.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 261769881 References: <33C61545.167EB0E7@tower.com><01bc94e6$9ced0820$287b7b7a@tlo2> <01bc9f26$7d7b56a0$02010101@nicks_pc> Reply-To: walth@netcom.com Organization: Delta Internet Services, Inc. Newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-08-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: On 2 Aug 97 09:28:20 GMT, "Nick Payne" wrote: >Jon S Anthony wrote in article >> Indeed. In 20 years SICP will still be highly relevant, useful, and >> probably fresh. OO may well have been tossed on the junk heap by >> then, but in any event (IMO) will not be holding center stage. > >What makes you think that civilisation will still be here in 20 years? Face >it, what we play around with on computers is just so much irrelevant crap. >Which is not to say that I don't enjoy doing it...I just recognise that the >end of the line is not so far off... > Good. You're right. Go away now. That will leave more for the rest of us. Walt Howard