From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	INVALID_MSGID,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,94f81131598e8e09,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: christian.hoppe@cww.de (Christian Hoppe)
Subject: Maintainability of ADA-Projects
Date: 1997/07/11
Message-ID: <33c6a8f9.5801121@news.cww.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 256270597
Organization: Telemedia News Server
Reply-To: christian.hoppe@cww.de
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Hi

We have a somewhat difficult management problem to solve. What we have
is a very complex software-project ( >1500 KLOC ) in advanced
progress. Our task is to provide the maintainability for this project.
Problem is the advanced stage of development, so the mechanisms to
provide maintainability have to be put up after/while coding is done.

My questions are :

Are there any possibilities to provide maintainability and quality in
a past/present-coding state ?
Are there known mechanisms to provide maintainability/quality in a
running process ?

Are there any rules to perform maintenance or to provide maintenance ?

Thank you very much

Christian Hoppe
-- Heute ist nicht alle Tage, ich komme wieder, keine Frage --