From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1efdd369be089610 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1025b4,499ea588f6acabff X-Google-Attributes: gid1025b4,public X-Google-Thread: f65d0,bd4d2fccdf730b16 X-Google-Attributes: gidf65d0,public From: rodemann@mathematik.uni-ulm.de (Joerg Rodemann) Subject: Re: gnat-3.10 Date: 1997/07/03 Message-ID: <33bb5e4a.0@news.uni-ulm.de>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 254238994 References: <1997Jun23.102715.1@eisner> Followup-To: comp.lang.ada,gnu.gcc,gnu.misc.discuss Organization: University of Ulm, SAI, Germany Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,gnu.gcc,gnu.misc.discuss Date: 1997-07-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar (dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu) wrote: > Ronald says > Incidentally Richard Stallman is definitely supportive of the notion of > not releasing free software before it is in an appropriate state. The > Linux folks have often argued that the Linux distributes should contain > the latest GCC snapshots, since obviously they fix bugs, but such an > attitude is not a good idea in the long run. > This is simply a matter of quality control, which seems in our judgment > to be as important for public releases of GNAT as it is for any other > customer releases that we make. In my opinion this is a very good point you made. Especially as Ada is --- at least in our mindset --- strongly connected with Software Quality or Quality Software. Certainly with Ada you could do the same crippled type of software one often finds in projects using C, C++ or else. At least the end users often seem not to care about anything like quality. Although they mutter if somethings goes wrong or worse (system crash, harddisk overwrite). So I believe it serves the Ada community very well if you provide us (and I'd like to thank you for making it publicly available to us) with a solid version of GNAT. this most probably will prohibit opinions and sensations that "Ada is not useful" just because the compiler is not good work. Surely we often hear these beliefs about Ada-83 in this group. As to the latest releases of any software my favourite route is: if you really need a new feature or you desire it like hell, try out the new ones. Otherwise stick to the running version until another one seems to be of the same quality. A collegue of mine is just fiddling around with his systems just because software X requires the latest release from Y which only runs in combination with the newest --- and totally incompatible --- release of Z. It gets really annoying if Y or Z are essential parts of a system like the OS itself or the development system. Greetings Joerg -- rodemann@mathematik.uni-ulm.de | Dipl.-Phys. Joerg S. Rodemann Phone: ++49-(0)711-5090670 | Flurstrasse 21, D-70372 Stuttgart, Germany -----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- rodemann@rus.uni-stuttgart.de | University of Stuttgart, Computing Center Phone: ++49-(0)711-685-5815 | Visualization Department, Office: 0.304 Fax: ++49-(0)711-678-7626 | Allmandring 30a, D-70550 Stuttgart, Germany