From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fac41,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3d3f20d31be1c33a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public
X-Google-Thread: f43e6,2c6139ce13be9980
X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public
From: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" <wwgrol@pseserv3.fw.hac.com>
Subject: Re: Safety-critical development in Ada and Eiffel
Date: 1997/08/23
Message-ID: <33FE513A.5180@pseserv3.fw.hac.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 268094934
Sender: usenet@most.fw.hac.com (News Administration)
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: sparc02
References: <33E9ADE9.4709@flash.net> <EEsF5y.F5H@syd.csa.com.au>
Organization: Hughes Defense Communications
Newsgroups: comp.object,comp.software-eng,comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel
Date: 1997-08-23T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> :Any time someone says something is obvious, without any evidence or
> :argument to support it, I pretty much assume that the point is ceded.

If someone says X is obvious, when many people do not see X, then
someone doesn't define obvious the same way I do.....