From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f66d11aeda114c52
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: fac41,f66d11aeda114c52
X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public
From: Samuel Mize <smize@link.com>
Subject: Re: Critique of Ariane 5 paper (finally!)
Date: 1997/08/22
Message-ID: <33FDECF3.19@link.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 267980736
References: <872172435.980@dejanews.com> <33FC66AD.9A0799D4@calfp.co.uk>
 <5til7i$boi$1@flood.weeg.uiowa.edu> <33FDDDA0.C38@link.com>
Organization: Hughes Training Inc.
Reply-To: smize@link.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel
Date: 1997-08-22T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Samuel Mize wrote:

> Co-author Jean-Marc Jezequel has said that this does not
> characterize what the paper was MEANT to say.  I have
> little dispute with what he says they MEANT to say[1]:
...
> [1] I'd dispute his first point if ...

This footnote looks like a reference.  I apologize for the
inclarity.

I should have referenced the text.  According to Deja News,
Mr. Jezequel posted this statement on 1997/03/18 to
comp.lang.eiffel, comp.object, comp.software-eng,
comp.programming.threads, comp.lang.ada, and comp.lang.java.tech.

Sam Mize