From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,1c8aeba24bc53c7b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: George Haddad <george.haddad@lmco.com>
Subject: Re: Request for Ada Coding Standards
Date: 1997/08/19
Message-ID: <33F9E4EA.7D92@lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 268034626
References: <33F4DFFA.7909@lmco.com> <5tces5$53f$1@client3.news.psi.net>
Organization: Lockheed Martin M & S, Sunnyvale, CA
Reply-To: george.haddad@lmco.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-08-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Jeff Burns wrote:
> If you become interested in checking out tools that help automate compliance
> with the SPC AQ&S, please take a look at our products: Ada-ASSURED and
> Ada-Utilities.

   Thank you.  Automation is an issue which is being dealt with as
well.  However, my focus at the moment is on getting the "rugged
individualists" to agree on _anything_.  Then we can automate some or
all of what they agree on. :-)
*****************************************************************
I found these opinions on my doorstep, would you please give them a good
home?