From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f7d969d93769b1bb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 11307a,f7d969d93769b1bb X-Google-Attributes: gid11307a,public From: "Tarjei T. Jensen" Subject: Re: Ada for OS/2 Date: 1997/08/19 Message-ID: <33F9C3A3.24C8@online.no>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 265286073 References: <5ovqj1$4ul$1@unlisys.unlisys.net> <5p06jo$c1r$2@elektron.et.tudelft.nl> <5p38a7$2df$2@unlisys.unlisys.net> <5p93ov$9ro@news.mr.net> <5p9tpm$e90$1@unlisys.unlisys.net> <5pbea3$a0v@corn.cso.niu.edu> <5peljs$i2p$1@gonzo.sun3.iaf.nl> <5t9i68$pns$1@gonzo.sun3.iaf.nl> Reply-To: tarjei@online.no Organization: Jensen programvareutvikling Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer.misc,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-08-19T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Geert Bosch wrote: > One last note: not only does using SET GCCOPT=-pipe not have any > effect on compilation speed, it does introduce some problems. When > GNAT generates informal messages, these messages get passed to the > assembler input with an error as result. The reason is that these > informal messages are written to standard out, just like the assembly > code when using pipes. This is rather disturbing as I would expect messages from the compiler to be written to stderr. Especially when stdout is other use. I would think that the handling of messages in the compiler needs some adjustments with regards to where they go. Greetings, -- // Tarjei T. Jensen // tarjei@online.no || voice +47 51 62 85 58 // Support you local rescue centre: GET LOST!