From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,f66d11aeda114c52 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,f66d11aeda114c52 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ken Garlington Subject: Re: Critique of Ariane 5 paper (finally!) Date: 1997/08/16 Message-ID: <33F5D5FF.1E2B@flash.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 265237678 References: <33E503B3.3278@flash.net> <33E8FC54.41C67EA6@eiffel.com> <33E9B217.39DA@flash.net> <33EA5592.5855@flash.net> <33EB4935.167EB0E7@eiffel.com> <33EB754E.446B9B3D@eiffel.com> <33EBE46D.2149@flash.net> <33EF9487.41C67EA6@eiffel.com> <33F20BCE.AB3@link.com> <33F22AD8.41C67EA6@eiffel.com> <33F33261.127D@link.com> <33F39E3C.50FB@invest.amp.com.au> <33F4908D.3509@link.com> <33F48C0B.41C67EA6@eiffel.com> Organization: Flashnet Communications, http://www.flash.net Reply-To: Ken.Garlington@computer.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel Date: 1997-08-16T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Bertrand Meyer wrote: > > Samuel Mize wrote as part of his response to Thomas Beale: > > > The paper claims DBC/Eiffel is THE ONE method that could have > > found the Ariane 5 flaw. > > I don't see the point of criticizing people for something > else than what they wrote, especially when the text is > available for everyone to read. Very true. See section 2 of http://www.flash.net/~kennieg/ariane.html for the specific quote from the Eiffel paper that substantiates Mr. Mize's position. (By the way, has anyone seen if this link has been placed on www.irisa.fr or www.eiffel.com?) > > -- > Bertrand Meyer, President, ISE Inc. > ISE Building, 2nd floor, 270 Storke Road, Goleta CA 93117 > 805-685-1006, fax 805-685-6869, > http://www.eiffel.com, with downloading instructions > == ISE Eiffel 4: Eiffel from those who invented it ==