From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 101deb,af27044bbd8d36a1
X-Google-Attributes: gid101deb,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,86616b1931cbdae5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <nospam@gsg.eds.com>
Subject: Re: Is Ada likely to survive ?
Date: 1997/08/11
Message-ID: <33EF6AC7.769C@gsg.eds.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 263657869
References: <33D005F2.E5DCD710@kaiwan.com>
 <5qp3cf$aqc$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
 <01bc977a$adaf91a0$8cb45ec3@newart.artel.it>
 <5rrtlt$i99$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <dewar.870524681@merv>
 <5s6q6b$f3$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <33ECDD08.3724@ibm.net>
Organization: EDS MS
Reply-To: nospam@gsg.eds.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.pl1
Date: 1997-08-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Ejon wrote:
>  
> Just curious, but didn't Multics go on to be reincarnated
> as "Unix"?

No, Unix was written for a small machine that didn't support the memory
model required by MULTICS, and was missing all that made MULTICS
desirable.

-- 

                        Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
                        Senior Software SE

The values in from and reply-to are for the benefit of spammers:
reply to domain eds.com, user msustys1.smetz or to domain gsg.eds.com,
user smetz.