From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,d24e07f660698f1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: f43e6,d24e07f660698f1 X-Google-Attributes: gidf43e6,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d24e07f660698f1 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d24e07f660698f1 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public From: "W. Wesley Groleau x4923" Subject: Re: I use Eiffel! and other "strange tongues"! Date: 1997/08/04 Message-ID: <33E61DE1.55E9@pseserv3.fw.hac.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 262373011 Sender: usenet@most.fw.hac.com (News Administration) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: sparc02 References: <33C61545.167EB0E7@tower.com> <01bc94e6$9ced0820$287b7b7a@tlo2> <33E1B18E.66B4DEC2@docs.uu.se> <33e4d7ec.1596193@news.deltanet.com> Organization: Hughes Defense Communications Newsgroups: comp.software-eng,comp.lang.eiffel,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-08-04T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > I think [OOP] is the terminal paradigm. It is like the wheel. > We're there. We've arrived at the proper [way to build software]. > We may make some minor adjustments in the future but the paradigm > itself will be our [computing core] for hundreds, if not thousands > of years. But that's just speculation of course. Except for the words in brackets, people have said this for hundreds, if not thousands, of years. > C and C++ are not high-fashion languages. C has had constant > growth since it's creation. C++ looks to be the spearhead that is > getting OOP accepted universally, despite it's problems. Sending > someone out into the real world knowing Pascal instead of C is > like sending a soldier into a battlefield with a BB Gun while > everyone else has an M16. More like sending a soldier out with hand-grenades while everyone else has 50-gallon drums of nitroglycerine or picric acid. :-) > What I'm saying is, you can write a Prolog interpreter, a > Smalltalk interpreter, a Fortan Compiler etc etc etc in C! But > you can't do the reverse. This is because these higher level > languages do not let you do certain things which are part and > parcel of the very woop and warf of computer programming. First you say OOP is the ultimate, and then you seem to say the "woop and warf" [sic] are only in C ? Do you need directions? An excellent Ada compiler has been written in Ada. A good (hearsay) COBOL compiler has been written in COBOL. Most FORTH systems are written in FORTH. What does that do to your argument? -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wes Groleau, Hughes Defense Communications, Fort Wayne, IN USA Senior Software Engineer - AFATDS Tool-smith Wanna-be wwgrol AT pseserv3.fw.hac.com Don't send advertisements to this domain unless asked! All disk space on fw.hac.com hosts belongs to either Hughes Defense Communications or the United States government. Using email to store YOUR advertising on them is trespassing! ----------------------------------------------------------------------