From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6a027e3683bf9fa5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Brett Kettering <brettk@llnl.gov>
Subject: Re: Ada 95 X binding with Apex
Date: 1997/08/04
Message-ID: <33E5F489.42F6092E@llnl.gov>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 262288696
References: <jcreem-3007971315010001@ljd155.sanders.lockheed.com>
To: Jeff Creem <jcreem@mailgw.sanders.lockheed.com>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Organization: LLNL
Reply-To: brettk@llnl.gov
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-08-04T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Jeff Creem wrote:

> Has anyone gotten the intermetrics Ada 95 X bindings to work with
> Rational
> apex 2.2.3A . I've got it working with GNAT but Apex does not like
> pragma convention due to RM_95 B.2(21)
>
> This does not appear to be related to the problems of the pragma
> appearing too late but a more generic problem with Apex supporting
> the pragma.
>
> I've read the section of the LRM and I can't figure out why Apex
> does not like it.
>
> Jeff

  The Apex compiler is not yet complete and pragma convention does not
work for types.  I am told that Apex V2.4 will complete the
implementation of pragma convention, but have not yet verified that.

Brett

--
Views and opinions expressed are mine and not those of
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.