From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fac41,f66d11aeda114c52,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfac41,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,f66d11aeda114c52,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Ken Garlington Subject: Critique of Ariane 5 paper (finally!) Date: 1997/08/03 Message-ID: <33E503B3.3278@flash.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 262435459 Organization: Flashnet Communications, http://www.flash.net Reply-To: kennieg@flash.net Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.eiffel Date: 1997-08-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: I've put what I hope is my final version of my critique of the Eiffel Ariane 5 paper at: http://www.flash.net/~kennieg/ariane.html I hope that this gets referenced from the Eiffel web site, to provide some balance to the original article. Thanks to everyone who helped out. Readers may also be interested in the Meyer article on Java at http://www.cm.cf.ac.uk/CLE//volume97/18338 The discussion is interesting in that Meyer (a) criticizes Java for not being used on large projects (whatever happened to unfair criticism of new languages? :), (b) uses the Ariane 5 paper as justification for the need for assertions, and (c) notes that Eiffel supports C++ interfaces, with Java VM support coming soon (why wait when Intermetrics already supports Ada applets running on the JVM? :)