From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,89226195d95fba21 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" Subject: Re: Operating Systems Date: 1997/08/01 Message-ID: <33E26D3D.59B6@gsg.eds.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 261867765 References: <33D541EF.17B6@digiscape.com> <5rhg4g$5ja$1@kelp.mbay.net> Organization: EDS MS Reply-To: nospam@gsg.eds.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-08-01T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: John Howard wrote: > > A particular operating system is the best choice if and only if it is the > best you can afford. Personally, I afforded to pay to use Warp for both my > business and home use. OS/2 is stable. Now IBM does the maintenance and > the improvements to the operating system mostly to make it easier to use. While it's been a year since I've booted anything but OS/2 at home, I think that it would be a mistake to write off Linux. The turn around time for bug fixes can be much less than for any shrinkwrap operating system, even if you don't have the skills and time to fix the bugs yourself. So my answer for the best operating system is Boot Manager (or LILO) ;-) > -- John Howard -- Team Ada Team OS/2 -- -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Senior Software SE The values in from and reply-to are for the benefit of spammers: reply to domain eds.com, user msustys1.smetz or to domain gsg.eds.com, user smetz.