From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e6c9800e35ccfeee
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "Tarjei T. Jensen" <tarjei@online.no>
Subject: Re: GNAT: Performance of String functions
Date: 1997/07/20
Message-ID: <33D1D2BB.2023@online.no>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 257817262
References: <33CF3908.3DF62EEE@ericsson.com> <dewar.869241859@merv>
 <33D11806.6C59@online.no> <dewar.869371653@merv>
Organization: Jensen programvareutvikling
Reply-To: tarjei@online.no
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-20T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:
> 
> Tarjei said
> 
> <<VAX Pascal passes strings by descriptors. The string pointed to by
> descriptor is of type counted string. A counted string has a maximum
> size, an actual size and the string itself. I'm not sure anymore if the
> descriptor contains the maximum size of the string or if the programmer
> have to keep track of this.
> 
> This means that comparing Ada bounded strings and VAX Pascal strings
> compares two different ways of doing things. Each time you change the
> size of an Ada bounded string there can be serious overhead.
> >>
> 
> So, clearly Vax Pascal strings are to be compared with bounded strings,
> not with unbounded strings, and presumably there is no automatic
> finalization involved.
> 
> I am not sure what your "serious" overhead message is about, makes no
> sense to me, but perhaps it is just not clear.

I wrote bounded string when I meant unbounded string. Silly me.

As unbounded strings are allocated on the heap there is a potential
serious overhead in allocating and deallocating space for these strings
as they change size. The serious overhead can include system calls to
allocate or free space. I expect that it also include wholesale copying
of the contents of the strings.

I have not checked the GNAT source for how unbounded strings are
handled.

Greetings,


-- 
// Tarjei T. Jensen 
//    tarjei@online.no || voice +47 51 62 85 58
//   Support you local rescue centre: GET LOST!