From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e215ef9bd62c159a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ron Thompson <thompsor@admin.tc.faa.gov>
Subject: Re: MVME177 CPU Utilization
Date: 1997/07/14
Message-ID: <33CA4E83.53E4@admin.tc.faa.gov>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 256823940
References: <33C4D576.2ACD@admin.tc.faa.gov>
 <33C56321.42D0@mailgw.sanders.lockheed.com> <5qaqp9$ont$1@news01.btx.dtag.de>
Organization: FAA Technical Center, Pomona, NJ
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-14T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Markus Nickels wrote:
> I agree to Steve. Your approach would be acceptable (from a customers
> point of view) if you have a mechanism which allocates dynamically (at
> run-time) processing power between the processors. If you choose a
....
> Markus Nickels
> Markus.Nickels@t-online.de

If email ok Markus, drop me a note and we can continue.  Thanks for your
response in front of the
group.                                                           
                                                                         
                                                                       
-- 
                                                                       
rct
                                                                        
The opinions above are mine and mine alone.