From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1de894020a6b5150,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Phillip Durbin Subject: Re: Dispatching and different types Date: 1997/07/11 Message-ID: <33C65AE3.167E@killians.gsfc.nasa.gov>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 256213642 References: <33C657C5.41C6@killians.gsfc.nasa.gov> Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center -- Greenbelt, Maryland USA Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-07-11T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: I guess that should be Q(T,B) or Q(A,T) with Q(A,B) called from P. Phillip Durbin wrote: > can't dispatch P(T,B) or P(A,T) with P(A,B) because both A and B are > derived types that are different. It seems to me it would be rather easy