From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,f7d969d93769b1bb
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 11307a,f7d969d93769b1bb
X-Google-Attributes: gid11307a,public
From: Michael Erdmann <boavista@berlin.snafu.de>
Subject: Re: Ada for OS/2 (was Re: Linux faster than OS/2...)
Date: 1997/07/07
Message-ID: <33C15097.4FE9@berlin.snafu.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 255314417
References: <5ovqj1$4ul$1@unlisys.unlisys.net>
 <5p06jo$c1r$2@elektron.et.tudelft.nl> <5p38a7$2df$2@unlisys.unlisys.net>
 <5p93ov$9ro@news.mr.net> <5p9tpm$e90$1@unlisys.unlisys.net>
 <5pbea3$a0v@corn.cso.niu.edu> <5peljs$i2p$1@gonzo.sun3.iaf.nl>
 <5phted$suk$1@unlisys.unlisys.net> <5pjqs1$n7m$1@gonzo.sun3.iaf.nl>
Organization: Unlimited Surprise Systems, Berlin
Reply-To: boavista@berlin.snafu.de
Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer.misc,comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-07-07T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Geert Bosch wrote:
> 
> [Some newsgroups removed]
> 
> In comp.lang.ada erdmann@ibm.net wrote:
>    I have re done my tests again based on the information in mind
>    i did receive so far. The results for a 5 packages OS/2 PM
>    program are:
> 
>            OS/2 : 107 sec
>            Linux:  95 sec
> 
> What you should look at is CPU load during compile which should be
> 100%. A lower figure indicates that the system is waiting for I/O,
> which can be caused by a diskcache that is too small, disabled
> lazy-write caching, or swapping due to insufficient memory.
> 
> When CPU-load is straight 100% you know you can't do much better.
> In that case the difference of 10% seems high to me for compilation.
> (Binding and linking is another story, the binder is I/O bound and
> the linker is system-dependent.)

The CPU is 100 % under load!

Michael