From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd6dd,c78177ec2e61f4ac X-Google-Attributes: gidfd6dd,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,c78177ec2e61f4ac X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" Subject: Re: ada and robots Date: 1997/07/03 Message-ID: <33BC2129.64A3@gsg.eds.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 254341515 References: <338CDA96.53EA@halcyon.com> <338F5D7D.6C03@tiac.net> <338F9D05.5EB3@bix.com> <5mqpj3$bc5$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <33930245.12A1@sprintmail.com> <5mv984$7kn@news.emi.com> <33A5D644.37A3@epix.net> <33A69E46.3230@gsfc.nasa.gov> <33AAC183.34C0@xtra.co.nz> Organization: EDS MS Reply-To: nospam@gsg.eds.com Newsgroups: comp.robotics.misc,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-07-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Matthew Heaney wrote: > > Of course, we could declare a full-blown set abstract data type, > implemented as a bit array, A type providing sets of small integers is quite remote from "a full-blown set abstract data type"; the confusion can be traced to the Pascal influence. If you want to see a language with "a full-blown set abstract data type", look a SETL, whic I understand was the original implimentation language for GNAT. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > Matthew Heaney > Software Development Consultant > > (818) 985-1271 -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Senior Software SE The values in from and reply-to are for the benefit of spammers: reply to domain eds.com, user msustys1.smetz or to domain gsg.eds.com, user smetz.