From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 11307a,f7d969d93769b1bb X-Google-Attributes: gid11307a,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,f7d969d93769b1bb X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: f4337,97c1afaa2414b3e2 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4337,public X-Google-Thread: fecf8,f7d969d93769b1bb X-Google-Attributes: gidfecf8,public From: Matthieu Willm Subject: Re: Ada for OS/2 (was Re: Linux faster than OS/2...) Date: 1997/07/03 Message-ID: <33BB750B.14DE@ibm.net>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 254244416 References: <5ovqj1$4ul$1@unlisys.unlisys.net> <5p06jo$c1r$2@elektron.et.tudelft.nl> <5p38a7$2df$2@unlisys.unlisys.net> <5p93ov$9ro@news.mr.net> <5p9tpm$e90$1@unlisys.unlisys.net> <5pbea3$a0v@corn.cso.niu.edu> <33BABA02.2762@ibm.net> Organization: private user Reply-To: willm@ibm.net Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.setup.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer.oop,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-07-03T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: What max. cache size did you use with ext2-os2 ? The default is 256 Kb and is small. But with larger cache sizes (4 Mb on my 40 Mb system) compilation speed of ext2-os2 itself is quite fast. Robert Dewar wrote: > > Ralph asks > > < style > file system boost the performance ? > >> > > In the only experiment we did on this, using the linux style file system > substantially slowed down compilation speed on OS/2.