From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=AC_FROM_MANY_DOTS,BAYES_20, INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5ecb5248e650e812 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Wes Groleau Subject: Re: Ada and robots Date: 1997/06/25 Message-ID: <33B135CA.40E2@no.such.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 252494165 Sender: usenet@most.fw.hac.com (News Administration) X-Nntp-Posting-Host: sparc02 References: <9706242128.AA09652@stealth.ctron.com> Organization: See Warning Below! Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > So what is the justification of insisting on building supposedly > safe systems (the Boeing) with a mix of safe components (Ada) and > unsafe ones (C and assembly)? To be a little more accurate, use the terms "low-risk" and "high-risk". Then the answer becomes: The justification is that a majority of low-risk software mixed with a little high-risk software is better than using only high-risk software. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Wes Groleau, Hughes Defense Communications, Fort Wayne, IN USA Senior Software Engineer - AFATDS Tool-smith Wanna-be wwgrol AT pseserv3.fw.hac.com Don't send advertisements to this domain unless asked! All disk space on fw.hac.com hosts belongs to either Hughes Defense Communications or the United States government. Using email to store YOUR advertising on them is trespassing! ----------------------------------------------------------------------