From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9e2776c05028676e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ken Garlington <Kennie.E.Garlington@lmco.com>
Subject: Re: Why Ada is not the Commercial Lang of Choice
Date: 1997/06/24
Message-ID: <33B02457.2B64@lmco.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 252282864
References: <33A7FBFF.29D2@mitre.org> <EC471t.Ltp@thomsoft.com>
 <dewar.866898018@merv>
Organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert Dewar wrote:
> 
> Keith said
> 
> <<GNAT follows this advice (the full type is modular, but that doesn't
> make literals available).  ObjectAda makes System.Address an access
> type.
> >>
> 
> That follows an old custom in Alsys compilers, where Address has always
> been an access type. What I do not like about this choice is that it means
> that the compiler always wants to initialize address values to the null
> pointer. This default initialization seems appropriate for access types,
> but I usually find it to be unwelcome junk overhead for addresses.
> 
> The modular representation seems more natural for modern machines.
> Historically one of the reasons for the Alsys choice was that the modular
> choice is NOT a good choice for the old junk segmented 286 architecture,
> and indeed if we still had to fight that machine, I would probably follow
> the access type decision, since it is indeed more portable in this sense.
> 
> (yes, yes, I know, the 32-bit x86 architecture still has segmentation, for
> gruesome details, see my book on Microprocessors - when Hennessey reviewed
> this section of the book, he wrote a large note asking "does anyone use
> this nonsense?" -- the answer to his question is pretty much no :-)

Of course, some of us still use 16-bit machines with segmentation (e.g.
MIL-STD-1750), but since by and large you can't get Ada 95 on such
machines,
it doesn't cause problems for Ada vendors.

--
LMTAS - The Fighter Enterprise - "Our Brand Means Quality"
Who uses Ada? See http://www.lmasc.lmco.com/f22
For job listings, other info: http://www.lmtas.com or
http://www.lmco.com