From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd6dd,c78177ec2e61f4ac X-Google-Attributes: gidfd6dd,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,c78177ec2e61f4ac X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Samuel Mize Subject: Re: ada and robots Date: 1997/06/18 Message-ID: <33A8082D.394AFB4C@link.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 249373866 References: <338CDA96.53EA@halcyon.com> <338F5D7D.6C03@tiac.net> <338F9D05.5EB3@bix.com> <5mqpj3$bc5$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> <33930245.12A1@sprintmail.com> <5mv984$7kn@news.emi.com> <33A5D644.37A3@epix.net> <33A7427F.6646@epix.net> Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link Newsgroups: comp.robotics.misc,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-18T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Matthew S. Whiting wrote: > Samuel's sarcasm provides me nothing ... > I'm not sure which is worse, the ignorance of many C > and C++ programmers or the arrogance of many Ada programmers... I'd vote for the arrogance of ignorant C/C++ programmers who post abusive messages on comp.lang.ada. Sorry if you took the brunt of my annoyance with other people. I hope the tone didn't keep you from reading the content. The difference between Ada and C coding really is often a matter of attitude: whether you are willing to take time up front to design, or want to jump right in and code, then take the time at the end to debug. I suggest you look over the web sites at the end of the weekly README: HOW TO GET HELP message. (The rest of the message is just netiquette for first-time posters.) -- -- Samuel Mize (817) 619-8622 smize@link.com "Team Ada" -- Hughes Training Inc. PO Box 6171 m/s 400, Arlington TX 76005