From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,6afaf3884e6e29ab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Heinz-Joachim Staerke Subject: Re: win32ada with Object Ada Date: 1997/06/17 Message-ID: <33A690CB.5A64@edv.mpi-stuttgart.mpg.de>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 249073955 References: Organization: Max-Planck Institute Stuttgart Reply-To: staerke@edv.mpi-stuttgart.mpg.de Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-17T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Saif-Ali Butt wrote: > > I have got Object Ada7 (Beta relaease) and Gnat 3.09 and both of the > compilers are failed to compile win32ada bindings. Object Ada does not > recognize the project files available in the bindings. However I opened a > new project and included some files in the project. Both of the compilers > have problems with the code in winnt.ads. > > If the code in winnt.ads really illegal, I ask, "How could it be compiled > on Gnat 3.02 (as is mentioned in the readme file)?" Normally all the > validated compilers should be able to compile a code or not to compile a > code. If some compilers can compile it and other not, then one cannot > talk about compatibility of compilers. > > With best wishes > > Saif Ali Butt none