From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,21bbcb8deeeab673
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch
Subject: Re: Ada95 Pretty-Printers/Coding styles
Date: 1997/06/17
Message-ID: <33A68335.44FDDAC6@elca-matrix.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 249051945
References: <33A54D07.4E14@aisf.com> <dewar.866484793@merv>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Organization: ELCA Matrix SA
Reply-To: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Robert wrote:

> Furthermore, style is much more than a set of mechanical rules which can
> be enforced by an automaton, so you will never get realy consistent style
> (such as is achieved in the GNAT sources) by this approach.

If you have an internal style guide for GNAT code, I'd be interested in
reading it (unless it's a secret recipe, of course :-)