From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,91c5b958fecf5eff
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch
Subject: Re: GNAT exception traceback
Date: 1997/06/13
Message-ID: <33A15F14.1B87D24F@elca-matrix.ch>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 248155284
References: <339EFAE3.26C@ccis.adisys.com.au> <dewar.866126413@merv>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Organization: ELCA Matrix SA
Reply-To: Mats.Weber@elca-matrix.ch
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> You need to run gdb to get the traceback. This is easy to do, so it is
> not clear why you set the precondition of not using it (your question
> is
> a bit like saying: can I use GNAT to compile my Ada program without
> using gcc -- the answer in both cases is no!)

I think this feature (traceback without gdb) would be very useful. It would
allow us to have a trace of errors occurring at our customers' sites without
reproducing the bug in our environment, which is often impossible.