From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,99222a5bd46ef3c9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Bryce Bardin <BBardin@westdat.com>
Subject: Re: GOTO considered necessary (reworked)
Date: 1997/06/11
Message-ID: <339F55EC.35D6@westdat.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 247799660
References: <5nn2fm$11dk$1@prime.imagin.net>
Organization: Western Datacom
Reply-To: BBardin@westdat.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


A point that should be made in your treatment of Ada goto's is that
it is *much* safer to use than goto's in most other languages, because: 

  o You can't transfer into a construct
  o You can't transfer out of a body
  o You can't transfer between the branches of 
    an if_statement or case statement

Bryce Bardin