From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ed926d4d933b76e3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Arthur Schwarz <schwarza@gdls.com>
Subject: Re: C interface - Apex/Verdix
Date: 1997/06/06
Message-ID: <3398487D.3850@gdls.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 246590113
References: <338ce5d2.87925678@news.mhv.net> <5mjb0u$dhi@newshub.atmnet.net>
 <3395DC9F.3A25@lmco.com>
To: Gary Brumfield <g.brumfield@lmco.com>
Organization: General Dynamics Land Systems
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-06T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Gary Brumfield wrote:
> 
> Christopher Green wrote:
> >
> 
> I am coding in Ada95 (for the first time) using the Apex Ada 2.2.3A
> compiler and need to interface with C/C++ code compiled using the Sun


FYI: Rational does NOT have a validated Ada95 compiler. Looking at
the validation results posted in SEIC,
"http://sw-eng.falls-church.va.us/AdaIC/", it appears that
the Rational Ada compiler has not passed a single Ada95 test from 
the ACVC. Rational has said that they will have a validated compiler 
in June, 97. I have no further information concerning this.

The note is written to make you aware that if you intend to treat
the Rational Ada95 compiler for anything but 'toy' projects, you
might be subject to future recoding efforts. 

art schwarz
aschwarz@acm.org