From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6afaf3884e6e29ab
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Tom Moran <tmoran@bix.com>
Subject: Re: win32ada with Object Ada
Date: 1997/06/03
Message-ID: <33944EC8.2C3C@bix.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 245877639
References: 
 <Pine.LNX.3.95.970603155149.11503A-100000@crusher.et.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
Organization: InterNex Information Services 1-800-595-3333
Reply-To: tmoran@bix.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-03T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


> If some compilers can compile it and other not, then one cannot
> talk about compatibility of compilers.
We're talking about compiler bugs here, and the set of bugs in one
compiler is unlikely to match the set in another (unless of course they
are both the empty set ;).