From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,18f6de557e6897b2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "John G. Volan" Subject: Re: circular unit dependency Date: 1997/06/02 Message-ID: <3392FC39.4E9D@sprintmail.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 245661507 References: <3386d96f.171920@noticias.ibernet.es> <9A7E8196B8D7EE83.E6C868B798076E45.6F1AD9E8B3E01F66@library-proxy.airnews.net> <3390987B.60DD@sprintmail.com> Reply-To: johnvolan@sprintmail.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-06-02T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: John G. Volan wrote: > > Kevin Cline wrote: > > > > Put them both in the same package, since neither is useful without the other. > > Au contraire, mon frere! Class1 may be useful in contexts 1, 2, 3 and 4; > class2 in contexts 3, 4, 5 and 6. If I am writing client code in > context 1 or 2, why should I care a whit about Class2? In context 5 or > 6, why should I care about Class1? Only in context 3 and 4 are both > needed together. For more on this, see my FAQ, section [4]: > > http://bluemarble.net/~jvolan/WithingProblem/FAQ.html#whybad Sorry, that should have been: http://bluemarble.net/~jvolan/WithingProblem/FAQ.html#why_bad ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Internet.Usenet.Put_Signature (Name => "John G. Volan", Employer => "Texas Instruments Advanced C3I Systems, San Jose, CA", Work_Email => "johnv@ti.com", Home_Email => "johnvolan@sprintmail.com", Slogan => "Ada95: World's *FIRST* International-Standard OOPL", Disclaimer => "My employer never defined these opinions, so using " & "them would be totally erroneous...or is that just " & "nondeterministic behavior now? :-) "); ------------------------------------------------------------------------