From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,18f6de557e6897b2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "John G. Volan" <johnvolan@sprintmail.com>
Subject: Re: circular unit dependency
Date: 1997/06/01
Message-ID: <3392472A.26F8@sprintmail.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 245544853
References: <3386d96f.171920@noticias.ibernet.es>
 <338C18B0.39F7@sprintmail.com>
Organization: Sprint Internet Passport
Reply-To: johnvolan@sprintmail.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-06-01T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


John G. Volan wrote:
> 
> Okay, folks, you can find the FAQ for this at:
> 
> http://bluemarble.net/~jvolan/WithingProblem/FAQ.html
> 
> Enjoy! :-)

A little update since I first released my FAQ web page: I've spiffed it 
up a bit more, modified some parts, and added some new content. In
particular:

- I've also added section 5.4, which compares the situation in C++ with
the proposed Ada0Y solutions to the "withing" problem. (Which I discuss
in sections 5.1-5.3. I just added those sections last week, so they
weren't originally in my FAQ on comp.lang.ada.)

- I've taken the LGPL off the Forward package and substituted the "Ada
Community License" devised by David Weller.  The ACL seems to be just
what I was looking for to guarantee this would be free software, but
without all the dogma. :-)
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet.Usenet.Put_Signature 
  (Name       => "John G. Volan",
   Employer   => "Texas Instruments Advanced C3I Systems, San Jose, CA",
   Work_Email => "johnv@ti.com",
   Home_Email => "johnvolan@sprintmail.com",
   Slogan     => "Ada95: World's *FIRST* International-Standard OOPL",
   Disclaimer => "My employer never defined these opinions, so using" & 
                 "them would be totally erroneous ... or is that"     &
                 "just nondeterministic behavior now? :-) ");
------------------------------------------------------------------------