From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public From: tstcroix@ix.netcom.com Subject: Re: Software Engineering and Dreamers Date: 1997/05/26 Message-ID: <338A2D0D.5B14@ix.netcom.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 244107860 References: <5m57nu$7si@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <5mcp5o$ei7$3@news.cc.ucf.edu> <5md1fl$9f4@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> Organization: Netcom X-NETCOM-Date: Mon May 26 5:38:26 PM PDT 1997 Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-26T17:38:26-07:00 List-Id: > > Examples: writing software is not engineering, and the result is not > technology, because principles of physics are not required to understand the > internal semantics of software systems. Designing a pure logic circuit isn't > engineering either, except when you have to solve implementation problems > related to heat dissipation, capacitive or inductive coupling and other > artifacts related to the _technology_. It may not be semantically correct to refer to 'software engineering technology' but the programming metaphor forces the issue... tim