From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d207bdc3561b595,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Matthew D. Hoel" Subject: Realtime Extensions for Windows NT Date: 1997/05/23 Message-ID: <3385CAC3.3EEE@eideticscorp.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 243370402 Organization: Eidetics Corp. Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-23T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Eidetics Corp. 3425 Lomita Blvd. Torrance, CA 90505-5010 U.S.A. (310) 326-8228 ext. 28 Facsimile (310) 326-9358 matt@eideticscorp.com Thursday, May 22, 1997 I am looking into realtime operating systems for an aircraft simulator I am working on. I am trying to decide whether to use realtime extensions for Windows NT such as Radisys' InTime or Imagination's Hyperkernel or proprietary realtime operating systems such as LynxOS or QNX. I would appreciate feedback from anybody who is currently using InTime or Hyperkernel and would know about the determinancy of each operating system's behavior. Matthew D. Hoel