From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,1042f393323e22da X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public From: Tom Moran Subject: Re: Software Engineering and Dreamers Date: 1997/05/22 Message-ID: <338524A3.2B1B@bix.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 243279953 References: <5lsjb3$bqc@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <01bc66fa$ee7910e0$LocalHost@xhv46.dial.pipex.com> Organization: InterNex Information Services 1-800-595-3333 Reply-To: tmoran@bix.com Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: > All (or almost all) the really great leaps forward in computer technology > have come not from great, expensive, laboratories, engaged in highly > directed (commercially orientated) research After thinking of Visicalc and Apple (which acually came after Wang, Basic 4, et al), I start drawing blanks on who outisde a great expensive lab developed great leaps forward. Some examples, please?