From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d1df6bc3799debed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Samuel A. Mize" Subject: Re: Syntax for tagged record types and class types Date: 1997/05/22 Message-ID: <3384B2B9.41C6@magellan.bgm.link.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 243382179 References: <3.0.32.19970423164855.00746db8@mail.4dcomm.com> <5kl9qc$g4d@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <5kmek2$9re@bcrkh13.bnr.ca> <33727FA5.5C7A@sprintmail.com> <3374C19F.15FE@sprintmail.com> <3376CF85.3E15@sprintmail.com> <33828299.2A3@world.std.com> <33830D58.6D8F@elca-matrix.ch> <3384A4EA.167E@magellan.bgm.link.com> Organization: PSI Public Usenet Link Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-05-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Samuel A. Mize wrote: >... However, you can get the prefix notation in Ada 95, by using a > generic package. [example deleted] > Arguments against this approach: > - it's more work > - it doesn't provide other benefits of package types It also doesn't allow you to have prefix notation for an object that is contained in an array or a record type. > Arguments in favor of it: > - it provides prefix syntax > - you can do it today in Ada 95 > > Sam Mize Sam Mize -- -- Samuel Mize (817) 619-8622 "Team Ada" -- Hughes Training Inc. PO Box 6171 m/s 400, Arlington TX 76005