From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.129.132.68 with SMTP id u65mr30788782ywf.47.1438021695674; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:28:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.140.21.74 with SMTP id 68mr478241qgk.16.1438021695636; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!69no2277770qgl.1!news-out.google.com!4ni82388qgh.1!nntp.google.com!69no2277766qgl.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:28:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8f0c3dfa-89a8-4758-8dd2-ed55765556f1@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.203.145.32; posting-account=AFCLjAoAAABJAOf_HjgEEEi3ty-lG5m2 NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.203.145.32 References: <8f0c3dfa-89a8-4758-8dd2-ed55765556f1@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <33808eff-fa7b-4437-8c15-51ae374eab99@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Doing Ada right? From: EGarrulo Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 18:28:15 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Received-Bytes: 1763 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1216611375 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:27044 Date: 2015-07-27T11:28:15-07:00 List-Id: On Monday, July 27, 2015 at 6:32:45 PM UTC+2, David Botton wrote: > 2) If already know or done with #1 - learn to be "type centric" in your development (here is an interesting article - http://blog.kickin-the-darkness.com/2007/08/fundamental-theory-of-ada.html) This was an interesting read, thanks. Indeed I am looking for these kind of suggestions, to learn how to "think in Ada". The Ada standard does come with a Rationale, but the Ada 2012 Rationale compares Ada 2012 to Ada 2005... I suppose that I could read all the Rationale documents since Ada 83, but that would be too much reading, I am afraid.